Back

AI Policy

The term “AI” mentioned below generally refers to Generative Artificial Intelligence tools (Generative AI tools), such as large language models (LLMs) or multimodal models. Examples include, but are not limited to, ChatGPT, Gemini, Google Notebook LM, Jasper AI, Microsoft Copilot and NovelAI.

Given that the current and evolving Generative AI technologies may involve risks such as inaccuracy and bias, lack of attribution, insufficient confidentiality and intellectual property protection, and unintended secondary uses, CPME has established the following AI usage policy. We will continue to monitor updates to AI-related policies in the publishing and academic communities.

CPME journal does not permit the use of AI-generated fabricated references, falsified data, or any other practices that compromise academic integrity.
A. For Authors
  • Generative AI tools must not be listed as authors or co-authors, as they cannot fulfill the essential requirements for authorship. These tools are unable to take responsibility for the submitted work, declare the presence or absence of conflicts of interest, or manage copyright and licensing agreements.
  • Using Generative AI tools to assist with tasks such as language polishing, translation, and improving the readability of a paper is acceptable. However, CPME does not accept papers that have been generated mostly or entirely by a Generative AI tool.
  • Authors bear full responsibility for the content of their work. They must ensure that the manuscript represents their authentic and original contribution, reflecting their own insights and ideas. Authors are also required to verify the accuracy, validity, and appropriateness of all content and citations, including those generated with the assistance of AI tools, and to correct any errors, biases, or inconsistencies before submission.
  • The use of Generative AI tools to create or modify images and figures is prohibited, unless there are exceptional circumstances and prior approval has been obtained from the Editorial Office.
  • Authors are permitted to use Generative AI tools to assist with tasks such as language polishing, translation, or data analysis during the writing process. However, the use of such tools must be fully disclosed at the time of submission and in the final manuscript (e.g., in the Methods section or Acknowledgments). The disclosure should include: 1. The full name and version of the tool used; 2. A description of how the tool was used; 3. The scope or extent of its use. Meanwhile authors will always remain responsible for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of their works.
*Statement Example (Acknowledgements Footnote): The paper used ChatGPT (GPT-5 model) as an assisting tool to search for and compile domestic and international journal articles related to cultural governance published between 2000 and 2010. All sources were subsequently verified, revised, and referenced by the author through direct examination of the original texts. The author assumes full responsibility for all content presented in this article.

*For the citation format when referencing AI-generated conversational content in a manuscript, please refer to Section D: Citation Guidelines.
B. For Peer Reviewers
  • When a researcher is invited to review a manuscript, the document must be treated as strictly confidential. Reviewers must not upload the submitted manuscript, or any portion of it, to any Generative AI tool, as doing so may violate the authors’ confidentiality and proprietary rights and, if the manuscript contains personally identifiable information, may also breach data privacy regulations.
  • Using Generative AI tools to assist with tasks such as language polishing, translation, and improving the readability of a paper is acceptable. However, CPME does not accept papers that have been generated mostly or entirely by a Generative AI tool.
  • CPME journal requests the author to fully disclose the way and scope for the use of Generative AI tools. If reviewers suspect any inappropriate or undisclosed use of Generative AI tool in a submission, they should report their concerns to the Journal Editor. Please look out for fake papers which are largely AI-generated.
  • Generative AI tool may only be utilized to assist with improving review language, but peer reviewers will always remain responsible for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of their reviews.
  • If any part of the review comments has been assisted or generated with the support of a Generative AI tool, reviewers are required to explicitly disclose this information in their review report.
C. For Editors
  • A submitted manuscript must be treated as a confidential document. Editors should not upload a submitted manuscript or any part of it into a Generative AI tool as this may violate the authors’ confidentiality and proprietary rights and, where the paper contains personally identifiable information, may breach data privacy rights.
  • CPME requests the author to fully disclose the way and scope for the use of Generative AI tools. If the editors (or the Editorial Board) suspect any undisclosed or inappropriate use of AI in a submission, they may request the authors to provide clarification and additional explanation.
  • Editors may use Generative AI tools for assistance in looking for suitable peer-reviewers.
D. Citation
  • Authors who make use of AI-generated content are required to clearly disclose how such tools have been used. Any specific content, whether quoted or paraphrased, must be properly cited in the main text or in the notes.
  • According to The Chicago Manual of Style Online, disclosures made in the text or footnotes should include the full name of the tool used, its version, the developer or provider, the date on which the content was generated, and whether the content was subsequently edited. If, for any reason, an AI conversation is included in the reference list, it should be cited under the name of the publisher or developer rather than the tool itself and should include a publicly accessible URL.



*Footnote Example:
Text generated by ChatGPT-3.5, OpenAI, December 9, 2023, https://chat.openai.com/share/90b8137d-ff1c-4c0c-b123-2868623c4ae2.


* Reference List Example:
Google. Response to “How many copyeditors does it take to fix a book-length manuscript?” Gemini 1.0, February 10, 2024. https://g.co/gemini/share/cccc26abdc19.










This AI policy is informed by and references the AI-related guidelines and policies of Elsevier, SAGE Publishing, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, the COPE Council (Committee on Publication Ethics), as well as journals such as the Journal of Cultural Economics and Mass Communication Research.

  網站會員Sign in
  TACPS
  TACPS